Enter a property and your financing, and AssetIQ runs a full underwriting pass - not a rough yield estimate - in about two minutes.
Including the additional-property surcharge where it applies, calculated against the actual current UK bands - not a flat percentage guess.
Management fees, maintenance, insurance, void periods and mortgage payments are all subtracted from rent before anything is called a return.
Run the exact same deal both ways - buying outright versus financing it - using identical costs throughout, so the comparison is actually fair.
Gross and net yield, ROI, cash-on-cash return, ROCE, and projected equity and cash flow out to 20 years - each measuring a genuinely different thing about the deal.
Address, type, bedrooms, tenure, whether it's tenanted - whatever you know. Fields you leave blank are left blank in the results too, never silently assumed.
Your actual letting agent percentage, maintenance allowance, insurance, and void assumption - not a fixed industry-average substituted in behind the scenes.
Cash, a standard buy-to-let mortgage, or bridging - interest rate, term, and repayment or interest-only, exactly as you'd actually structure it.
Every figure on the page - the headline numbers, the tax breakdown, the stress test, the 20-year projection - comes from this one calculation, so they can never quietly disagree with each other.
Gross yield alone hides the numbers that actually decide whether a property makes money - void periods, management costs, mortgage interest at a realistic rate.
They care about interest coverage at a stressed rate. Seeing that result before you make an offer means finding out you can’t get funded before you’ve committed to anything, not after.
A calculator that lets you quietly change assumptions between two properties isn’t comparing them at all. The same engine, the same rules, every time, is what makes a comparison mean something.
Put a real property through it - your own, or one you've been eyeing - and see the full breakdown for yourself.