UK buy-to-let lenders don't approve a mortgage because the yield looks healthy. They run an interest coverage ratio test at a stressed rate, and AssetIQ runs the exact same one.

Tests affordability at your pay rate plus 2%, or 5.5% - whichever is higher - the same floor lenders use so a deal isn’t only viable at today’s unusually low rates.
Basic-rate taxpayers and limited companies are tested at 125% coverage; higher and additional-rate taxpayers at 145%, reflecting the real difference Section 24 makes to what you keep.
HMOs and multi-unit blocks carry their own, higher requirement - shown as a realistic range (130% to 170%), because real lender criteria for these varies far more than a single figure would suggest.
No ambiguous score - each band shows a clear pass or fail against the real coverage ratio your rental income would need to clear.
Rent, mortgage amount, and the rate you’d really be offered - not a generic market-average rate substituted in.
Recalculates what the mortgage payment would be at the stressed rate, not the pay rate - the number a lender is actually underwriting against.
Divides stressed annual rent by stressed annual interest, and checks the result against 125%, 145%, or the HMO range, depending on the property.
Both bands, side by side, so you can see not just whether it passes today’s typical rate but whether it has real headroom if rates move.
Plenty of deals that look fine on gross yield alone don’t clear a lender’s stress test at all - finding that out before you offer, not after, is the entire point.
The same property can pass easily through a limited company and fail outright for a higher-rate individual taxpayer - the structure you buy through isn’t a minor detail here.
Seeing the actual margin, not just a pass/fail, is what tells you whether a deal has genuine headroom or is one rate rise away from becoming unfundable.
Run a real deal through it and see exactly where it sits against both bands.